Use the report-pack access code. These are review samples, not certifications, ratings, legal opinions, valuations, or site inspections.
Invalid access code.
CIVITRACK
10 source-linked sample reports.
Eight road dossiers selected only after external reconciliation found them source-consistent, plus two non-road source-context samples. Every report shows confirmations, gaps, abstains, source routes, contractor/entity context, satellite boundaries, and reviewer questions.
10sample dossiers
8/8road samples source-consistent in Layer B dry run
5road samples with independent Set-A corroboration
0No satellite-derived public progress score
Rs 49,00010-project paid pilot offer
Cross-check process in place. Current road validation set: 120 source-consistent, 91 hold, 61 insufficient external. Hold rows are excluded from this customer sample pack.
ROAD-01 | Roads & Highways | 618864
4L from Mathura Bypass Start at Existing Km. 154.20 of NH-44 to Gaju Village at Km 32.982 of NH-530B Pkg-IB
PCC Issued, CC Pending; 100. Source-consistent across promoted UPC checks.
SOURCE_CONSISTENT_REVIEW_SAMPLE
Executive Snapshot
PAIMANA code
618864
Promoted UPCs
N/08026/02002/UP
NH / corridor
NH-44
Official stage field
PCC Issued, CC Pending
Official physical field
100
Public cost context
Rs 1722 Cr
Public revised cost
Rs 1820.77 Cr
Public scheduled completion
19/03/2025
Public revised completion
01/07/2026
RBI source-backed fields
12
Open evidence gaps
6
Cross-Check Verdict
SOURCE_CONSISTENT
set_a_confirmations:6
Independent Set-A: No independent Set-A source confirmed in this dry run; NHAI/PAIMANA source consistency still passed.
Fail-closed rule: unreachable, absent, or rate-limited sources are gaps, never confirmations.
Evidence Field Map
Project name
4L from Mathura Bypass Start at Existing Km. 154.20 of NH-44 to Gaju Village at Km 32.982 of NH-530B Pkg-IB
total capital cost Rs 1722.11 Cr; awarded/civil cost Rs 885 Cr; PAIMANA-public-cost, NHAI-total-capital-cost, and NHAI-awarded-cost may be different official bases.
At least one public cost reconciles to NHAI total-capital cost basis.
project code=618864; project name=4L from Mathura Bypass Start at Existing Km. 154.20 of NH-44 to Gaju Village at Km 32.982 of NH-530B Pkg-IB; nh tokens=NH44, NH530B
No exact IIG/NIP project-id match in local public crawl.
Re-check promoted UPC, stage/status, physical field, cost basis, and scheduled date before sending externally.
Re-check contractor CIN, filings, rating/adverse routes, and material public disclosures before any borrower or contractor reliance.
If any source is unreachable, mark INSUFFICIENT_EXTERNAL; never treat absence as confirmation.
Satellite Visibility Appendix
Paid add-on only: two-date corridor construction-visibility review for ROW, formation, embankment, pavement texture, structures, and access activity.
Output is dated visual evidence, confidence notes, and LIE/site questions.
No satellite-derived public progress score. No stage certification. No engineering quality approval.
Reviewer Questions
Does the lender file contain sanctioned DCCO and approved revised DCCO that differ from public schedule dates?
Does the LIE/site team agree with the displayed official stage and the latest material-change status?
Is the borrower/concessionaire SPV legally distinct from the EPC contractor or listed sponsor?
Which open gaps must be closed before committee, renewal, disbursement, or portfolio action?
Not a stage certification.Not a credit rating.Not an RBI compliance certificate.No satellite-derived public progress score.External customer use requires audit and founder approval.
ROAD-02 | Roads & Highways | 617982
Widening and strengthening of existing 2-lane to 2- lane with paved shoulders from km 159/0 to 165/4 and 186/0 to 215/0 of NH-163 on EPC mode int the state of Telangana
Under Construction (AD issued); Under Construction (AD issued). Source-consistent across promoted UPC checks.
SOURCE_CONSISTENT_REVIEW_SAMPLE
Executive Snapshot
PAIMANA code
617982
Promoted UPCs
N/06003/01003/TS
NH / corridor
NH-163
Official stage field
Under Construction (AD issued)
Official physical field
Under Construction (AD issued)
Public cost context
Rs 230 Cr
Public revised cost
Rs EVIDENCE_PENDING Cr
Public scheduled completion
30/11/2019
Public revised completion
03/12/2020
RBI source-backed fields
11
Open evidence gaps
6
Cross-Check Verdict
SOURCE_CONSISTENT
set_a_confirmations:5
Independent Set-A: iig_nip
Fail-closed rule: unreachable, absent, or rate-limited sources are gaps, never confirmations.
Evidence Field Map
Project name
Widening and strengthening of existing 2-lane to 2- lane with paved shoulders from km 159/0 to 165/4 and 186/0 to 215/0 of NH-163 on EPC mode int the state of Telangana
iig project id=617982; project name=Widening and strengthening of existing 2-lane to 2- lane with paved shoulders from km 159/0 to 165/4 and 186/0 to 215/0 of NH-163 on EPC mode int the state of Telangana; state=Telangana; cost display=USD 28.92 mn
Independent IIG/NIP exact project-id match corroborates project identity; not used as progress truth.
awarded/civil cost Rs 35 Cr; PAIMANA-public-cost, NHAI-total-capital-cost, and NHAI-awarded-cost may be different official bases.
LABELLED_BASIS_DIFFERENCE: public cost and NHAI package/capital/award cost use different official bases; not a contradiction without independent basis evidence.
Re-check promoted UPC, stage/status, physical field, cost basis, and scheduled date before sending externally.
Re-check contractor CIN, filings, rating/adverse routes, and material public disclosures before any borrower or contractor reliance.
If any source is unreachable, mark INSUFFICIENT_EXTERNAL; never treat absence as confirmation.
Satellite Visibility Appendix
Paid add-on only: two-date corridor construction-visibility review for ROW, formation, embankment, pavement texture, structures, and access activity.
Output is dated visual evidence, confidence notes, and LIE/site questions.
No satellite-derived public progress score. No stage certification. No engineering quality approval.
Reviewer Questions
Does the lender file contain sanctioned DCCO and approved revised DCCO that differ from public schedule dates?
Does the LIE/site team agree with the displayed official stage and the latest material-change status?
Is the borrower/concessionaire SPV legally distinct from the EPC contractor or listed sponsor?
Which open gaps must be closed before committee, renewal, disbursement, or portfolio action?
Not a stage certification.Not a credit rating.Not an RBI compliance certificate.No satellite-derived public progress score.External customer use requires audit and founder approval.
ROAD-03 | Roads & Highways | 618397
Widening and Up-gradation to 2-Lane with Paved Shoulder of configuration and geometric improvement from Km 0.000 to Km 16.990 on Chenani Sudhmahadev section of NH-244 in UT of Jammu and Kashmir to be executed on EPC basis
Under Construction (AD issued); 62.81. Source-consistent across promoted UPC checks.
SOURCE_CONSISTENT_REVIEW_SAMPLE
Executive Snapshot
PAIMANA code
618397
Promoted UPCs
N/09106/01001/JK
NH / corridor
NH-244
Official stage field
Under Construction (AD issued)
Official physical field
62.81
Public cost context
Rs 256 Cr
Public revised cost
Rs EVIDENCE_PENDING Cr
Public scheduled completion
21/11/2020
Public revised completion
04/02/2022
RBI source-backed fields
12
Open evidence gaps
5
Cross-Check Verdict
SOURCE_CONSISTENT
set_a_confirmations:6
Independent Set-A: iig_nip
Fail-closed rule: unreachable, absent, or rate-limited sources are gaps, never confirmations.
Evidence Field Map
Project name
Widening and Up-gradation to 2-Lane with Paved Shoulder of configuration and geometric improvement from Km 0.000 to Km 16.990 on Chenani Sudhmahadev section of NH-244 in UT of Jammu and Kashmir to be executed on EPC basis
iig project id=618397; project name=Widening and Up-gradation to 2-Lane with Paved Shoulder of configuration and geometric improvement from Km 0.000 to Km 16.990 on Chenani Sudhmahadev section of NH-244 in UT of Jammu and Kashmir to be executed on EPC basis; state=Jammu and Kashmir; cost display=USD 32.18 mn
Independent IIG/NIP exact project-id match corroborates project identity; not used as progress truth.
total capital cost Rs 295.06 Cr; awarded/civil cost Rs 236 Cr; PAIMANA-public-cost, NHAI-total-capital-cost, and NHAI-awarded-cost may be different official bases.
LABELLED_BASIS_DIFFERENCE: public cost and NHAI package/capital/award cost use different official bases; not a contradiction without independent basis evidence.
Re-check promoted UPC, stage/status, physical field, cost basis, and scheduled date before sending externally.
Re-check contractor CIN, filings, rating/adverse routes, and material public disclosures before any borrower or contractor reliance.
If any source is unreachable, mark INSUFFICIENT_EXTERNAL; never treat absence as confirmation.
Satellite Visibility Appendix
Paid add-on only: two-date corridor construction-visibility review for ROW, formation, embankment, pavement texture, structures, and access activity.
Output is dated visual evidence, confidence notes, and LIE/site questions.
No satellite-derived public progress score. No stage certification. No engineering quality approval.
Reviewer Questions
Does the lender file contain sanctioned DCCO and approved revised DCCO that differ from public schedule dates?
Does the LIE/site team agree with the displayed official stage and the latest material-change status?
Is the borrower/concessionaire SPV legally distinct from the EPC contractor or listed sponsor?
Which open gaps must be closed before committee, renewal, disbursement, or portfolio action?
Not a stage certification.Not a credit rating.Not an RBI compliance certificate.No satellite-derived public progress score.External customer use requires audit and founder approval.
ROAD-04 | Roads & Highways | 618582
4L of Galgalia - Bahadurganj section from Km 0.000 to Km 49.000 Package-I of NH327E
CC Issued; 100. Source-consistent across promoted UPC checks.
SOURCE_CONSISTENT_REVIEW_SAMPLE
Executive Snapshot
PAIMANA code
618582
Promoted UPCs
N/03012/02001/BR
NH / corridor
NH-327E
Official stage field
CC Issued
Official physical field
100
Public cost context
Rs 1283 Cr
Public revised cost
Rs 1282.97 Cr
Public scheduled completion
09/01/2024
Public revised completion
EVIDENCE_PENDING
RBI source-backed fields
12
Open evidence gaps
6
Cross-Check Verdict
SOURCE_CONSISTENT
set_a_confirmations:7
Independent Set-A: iig_nip
Fail-closed rule: unreachable, absent, or rate-limited sources are gaps, never confirmations.
Evidence Field Map
Project name
4L of Galgalia - Bahadurganj section from Km 0.000 to Km 49.000 Package-I of NH327E
total capital cost Rs 1282.97 Cr; awarded/civil cost Rs 1051 Cr; PAIMANA-public-cost, NHAI-total-capital-cost, and NHAI-awarded-cost may be different official bases.
At least one public cost reconciles to NHAI total-capital cost basis.
iig project id=618582; project name=4L of Galgalia - Bahadurganj section from Km 0.000 to Km 49.000 Package-I of NH327E; state=Bihar; cost display=USD 161.32 mn
Independent IIG/NIP exact project-id match corroborates project identity; not used as progress truth.
Re-check promoted UPC, stage/status, physical field, cost basis, and scheduled date before sending externally.
Re-check contractor CIN, filings, rating/adverse routes, and material public disclosures before any borrower or contractor reliance.
If any source is unreachable, mark INSUFFICIENT_EXTERNAL; never treat absence as confirmation.
Satellite Visibility Appendix
Paid add-on only: two-date corridor construction-visibility review for ROW, formation, embankment, pavement texture, structures, and access activity.
Output is dated visual evidence, confidence notes, and LIE/site questions.
No satellite-derived public progress score. No stage certification. No engineering quality approval.
Reviewer Questions
Does the lender file contain sanctioned DCCO and approved revised DCCO that differ from public schedule dates?
Does the LIE/site team agree with the displayed official stage and the latest material-change status?
Is the borrower/concessionaire SPV legally distinct from the EPC contractor or listed sponsor?
Which open gaps must be closed before committee, renewal, disbursement, or portfolio action?
Not a stage certification.Not a credit rating.Not an RBI compliance certificate.No satellite-derived public progress score.External customer use requires audit and founder approval.
ROAD-05 | Roads & Highways | 618583
4L of Bahadurganj Araria section from Km 49.000 to Km 94.000 Package-II of NH-327E
CC Issued; 100. Source-consistent across promoted UPC checks.
SOURCE_CONSISTENT_REVIEW_SAMPLE
Executive Snapshot
PAIMANA code
618583
Promoted UPCs
N/03012/03001/BR
NH / corridor
NH-327E
Official stage field
CC Issued
Official physical field
100
Public cost context
Rs 1359 Cr
Public revised cost
Rs 1358.77 Cr
Public scheduled completion
09/01/2024
Public revised completion
12/05/2024
RBI source-backed fields
14
Open evidence gaps
4
Cross-Check Verdict
SOURCE_CONSISTENT
set_a_confirmations:7
Independent Set-A: iig_nip
Fail-closed rule: unreachable, absent, or rate-limited sources are gaps, never confirmations.
Evidence Field Map
Project name
4L of Bahadurganj Araria section from Km 49.000 to Km 94.000 Package-II of NH-327E
total capital cost Rs 1358.77 Cr; awarded/civil cost Rs 1081.7 Cr; PAIMANA-public-cost, NHAI-total-capital-cost, and NHAI-awarded-cost may be different official bases.
At least one public cost reconciles to NHAI total-capital cost basis.
iig project id=618583; project name=4L of Bahadurganj Araria section from Km 49.000 to Km 94.000 Package-II of NH-327E; state=Bihar; cost display=USD 170.85 mn
Independent IIG/NIP exact project-id match corroborates project identity; not used as progress truth.
Re-check promoted UPC, stage/status, physical field, cost basis, and scheduled date before sending externally.
Re-check contractor CIN, filings, rating/adverse routes, and material public disclosures before any borrower or contractor reliance.
If any source is unreachable, mark INSUFFICIENT_EXTERNAL; never treat absence as confirmation.
Satellite Visibility Appendix
Paid add-on only: two-date corridor construction-visibility review for ROW, formation, embankment, pavement texture, structures, and access activity.
Output is dated visual evidence, confidence notes, and LIE/site questions.
No satellite-derived public progress score. No stage certification. No engineering quality approval.
Reviewer Questions
Does the lender file contain sanctioned DCCO and approved revised DCCO that differ from public schedule dates?
Does the LIE/site team agree with the displayed official stage and the latest material-change status?
Is the borrower/concessionaire SPV legally distinct from the EPC contractor or listed sponsor?
Which open gaps must be closed before committee, renewal, disbursement, or portfolio action?
Not a stage certification.Not a credit rating.Not an RBI compliance certificate.No satellite-derived public progress score.External customer use requires audit and founder approval.
ROAD-06 | Roads & Highways | 618631
6L of MH/KN Border Nimbal Village to KN/TS Border Singnodi Village from Km. 162.5 to Km. 203.100 in Raichur of NH-150C Pkg-IV
PCC Issued, CC Pending; 99.51. Source-consistent across promoted UPC checks.
SOURCE_CONSISTENT_REVIEW_SAMPLE
Executive Snapshot
PAIMANA code
618631
Promoted UPCs
N/04008/03004/KA
NH / corridor
NH-150C
Official stage field
PCC Issued, CC Pending
Official physical field
99.51
Public cost context
Rs 1500 Cr
Public revised cost
Rs 1457.48 Cr
Public scheduled completion
13/05/2025
Public revised completion
30/06/2026
RBI source-backed fields
14
Open evidence gaps
4
Cross-Check Verdict
SOURCE_CONSISTENT
set_a_confirmations:7
Independent Set-A: iig_nip
Fail-closed rule: unreachable, absent, or rate-limited sources are gaps, never confirmations.
Evidence Field Map
Project name
6L of MH/KN Border Nimbal Village to KN/TS Border Singnodi Village from Km. 162.5 to Km. 203.100 in Raichur of NH-150C Pkg-IV
total capital cost Rs 1499.73 Cr; awarded/civil cost Rs 987.68 Cr; PAIMANA-public-cost, NHAI-total-capital-cost, and NHAI-awarded-cost may be different official bases.
At least one public cost reconciles to NHAI total-capital cost basis.
iig project id=618631; project name=6L of MH/KN Border Nimbal Village to KN/TS Border Singnodi Village from Km. 162.5 to Km. 203.100 in Raichur of NH-150C Pkg-IV; state=Karnataka,Telangana; cost display=USD 183.26 mn
Independent IIG/NIP exact project-id match corroborates project identity; not used as progress truth.
Re-check promoted UPC, stage/status, physical field, cost basis, and scheduled date before sending externally.
Re-check contractor CIN, filings, rating/adverse routes, and material public disclosures before any borrower or contractor reliance.
If any source is unreachable, mark INSUFFICIENT_EXTERNAL; never treat absence as confirmation.
Satellite Visibility Appendix
Paid add-on only: two-date corridor construction-visibility review for ROW, formation, embankment, pavement texture, structures, and access activity.
Output is dated visual evidence, confidence notes, and LIE/site questions.
No satellite-derived public progress score. No stage certification. No engineering quality approval.
Reviewer Questions
Does the lender file contain sanctioned DCCO and approved revised DCCO that differ from public schedule dates?
Does the LIE/site team agree with the displayed official stage and the latest material-change status?
Is the borrower/concessionaire SPV legally distinct from the EPC contractor or listed sponsor?
Which open gaps must be closed before committee, renewal, disbursement, or portfolio action?
Not a stage certification.Not a credit rating.Not an RBI compliance certificate.No satellite-derived public progress score.External customer use requires audit and founder approval.
ROAD-07 | Roads & Highways | 618529
Varanasi Ring Road Pkg-II connecting Sandaha Village km 11.70 / NH-29 with Revasa Village km 818.80 / NH-2
Under Construction (AD issued); 94.8. Source-consistent across promoted UPC checks.
SOURCE_CONSISTENT_REVIEW_SAMPLE
Executive Snapshot
PAIMANA code
618529
Promoted UPCs
N/02005/11001/UP
NH / corridor
NH-29
Official stage field
Under Construction (AD issued)
Official physical field
94.8
Public cost context
Rs 1992 Cr
Public revised cost
Rs 1832.66 Cr
Public scheduled completion
13/02/2022
Public revised completion
31/10/2026
RBI source-backed fields
12
Open evidence gaps
5
Cross-Check Verdict
SOURCE_CONSISTENT
set_a_confirmations:6
Independent Set-A: No independent Set-A source confirmed in this dry run; NHAI/PAIMANA source consistency still passed.
Fail-closed rule: unreachable, absent, or rate-limited sources are gaps, never confirmations.
Evidence Field Map
Project name
Varanasi Ring Road Pkg-II connecting Sandaha Village km 11.70 / NH-29 with Revasa Village km 818.80 / NH-2
total capital cost Rs 1991.71 Cr; awarded/civil cost Rs 949 Cr; PAIMANA-public-cost, NHAI-total-capital-cost, and NHAI-awarded-cost may be different official bases.
At least one public cost reconciles to NHAI total-capital cost basis.
project code=618529; project name=Varanasi Ring Road Pkg-II connecting Sandaha Village km 11.70 / NH-29 with Revasa Village km 818.80 / NH-2; nh tokens=NH2, NH29
No exact IIG/NIP project-id match in local public crawl.
Re-check promoted UPC, stage/status, physical field, cost basis, and scheduled date before sending externally.
Re-check contractor CIN, filings, rating/adverse routes, and material public disclosures before any borrower or contractor reliance.
If any source is unreachable, mark INSUFFICIENT_EXTERNAL; never treat absence as confirmation.
Satellite Visibility Appendix
Paid add-on only: two-date corridor construction-visibility review for ROW, formation, embankment, pavement texture, structures, and access activity.
Output is dated visual evidence, confidence notes, and LIE/site questions.
No satellite-derived public progress score. No stage certification. No engineering quality approval.
Reviewer Questions
Does the lender file contain sanctioned DCCO and approved revised DCCO that differ from public schedule dates?
Does the LIE/site team agree with the displayed official stage and the latest material-change status?
Is the borrower/concessionaire SPV legally distinct from the EPC contractor or listed sponsor?
Which open gaps must be closed before committee, renewal, disbursement, or portfolio action?
Not a stage certification.Not a credit rating.Not an RBI compliance certificate.No satellite-derived public progress score.External customer use requires audit and founder approval.
ROAD-08 | Roads & Highways | 618560
Improvement of Geometrics of Thondupally to Kothur from Km 22.300 to Km 34.14 of NH-44
Terminated; 17.05. Source-consistent across promoted UPC checks.
SOURCE_CONSISTENT_REVIEW_SAMPLE
Executive Snapshot
PAIMANA code
618560
Promoted UPCs
N/02010/01002/TS
NH / corridor
NH-44
Official stage field
Terminated
Official physical field
17.05
Public cost context
Rs 542 Cr
Public revised cost
Rs 527.43 Cr
Public scheduled completion
16/09/2024
Public revised completion
EVIDENCE_PENDING
RBI source-backed fields
12
Open evidence gaps
5
Cross-Check Verdict
SOURCE_CONSISTENT
set_a_confirmations:6
Independent Set-A: No independent Set-A source confirmed in this dry run; NHAI/PAIMANA source consistency still passed.
Fail-closed rule: unreachable, absent, or rate-limited sources are gaps, never confirmations.
Evidence Field Map
Project name
Improvement of Geometrics of Thondupally to Kothur from Km 22.300 to Km 34.14 of NH-44
total capital cost Rs 541.58 Cr; awarded/civil cost Rs 311 Cr; PAIMANA-public-cost, NHAI-total-capital-cost, and NHAI-awarded-cost may be different official bases.
At least one public cost reconciles to NHAI total-capital cost basis.
Re-check promoted UPC, stage/status, physical field, cost basis, and scheduled date before sending externally.
Re-check contractor CIN, filings, rating/adverse routes, and material public disclosures before any borrower or contractor reliance.
If any source is unreachable, mark INSUFFICIENT_EXTERNAL; never treat absence as confirmation.
Satellite Visibility Appendix
Paid add-on only: two-date corridor construction-visibility review for ROW, formation, embankment, pavement texture, structures, and access activity.
Output is dated visual evidence, confidence notes, and LIE/site questions.
No satellite-derived public progress score. No stage certification. No engineering quality approval.
Reviewer Questions
Does the lender file contain sanctioned DCCO and approved revised DCCO that differ from public schedule dates?
Does the LIE/site team agree with the displayed official stage and the latest material-change status?
Is the borrower/concessionaire SPV legally distinct from the EPC contractor or listed sponsor?
Which open gaps must be closed before committee, renewal, disbursement, or portfolio action?
Not a stage certification.Not a credit rating.Not an RBI compliance certificate.No satellite-derived public progress score.External customer use requires audit and founder approval.
NONROAD-01 | Electricity Generation | 602579
Buxar Thermal Power Project [1320 MW]
SJVN; 99% minimum unit physical progress per CEA source route
Road Layer B is not applied to this sector.; CEA thermal source route provides official sector context.; Customer use requires a sector-specific audit before delivery.
Road Layer B is not applied to this sector.; CEA thermal source route provides official sector context.; Customer use requires a sector-specific audit before delivery.